How the Strangler Fig Pattern supports legacy system replacement?
Curious about how to modernise your legacy system with minimal disruption? The Strangler Fig Pattern allows for a gradual replacement strategy. In this article, we’ll explore how this pattern works and its benefits.
Key takeaways on the Strangler Fig Pattern
- The Strangler Fig Pattern facilitates gradual modernisation of legacy systems by incrementally replacing functionalities, ensuring business continuity.
- This architectural approach utilises a routing layer, such as an API gateway, to manage requests between legacy and modern components, minimising disruption during the transition.
- Ideal for large monolithic systems and business-critical applications, the Strangler Fig Pattern allows for low-risk migration, enabling teams to test and integrate new features seamlessly.
What is the Strangler Fig Pattern?
The Strangler Fig Pattern is a software design pattern that facilitates the modernisation of legacy systems.
The concept, coined by Martin Fowler, was inspired by the unique growth process of strangler figs observed in Queensland rainforests.
Drawing inspiration from this, an architectural pattern offers a gradual approach to migrating from monolithic architecture to microservices.
In essence, the Strangler Fig Pattern allows for a smooth transition by incrementally replacing specific functionalities of a legacy system with new applications. This approach enables existing applications to function during the modernisation process, ensuring minimal disruption to business operations.
As new components are developed and integrated, the responsibilities of the legacy system are gradually reduced, eventually leading to its complete replacement.
How does the Strangler Pattern help replace legacy systems?
The Strangler Pattern helps replace legacy systems by enabling a gradual, controlled transition from old to modern architecture – without the need for a disruptive “big bang” rewrite.
Instead of replacing the entire system at once, which can be risky and time-consuming, this pattern allows teams to build new functionality alongside the existing legacy application.
This incremental migration process not only reduces transformation risk but also ensures that new features and services can be validated in production before fully transitioning to them.
A key component of this approach is the routing layer or façade, often implemented as an API gateway, that directs specific requests either to the legacy system or to newly developed components.
This setup enables developers to replace one feature or module at a time, validate it in production, and then reroute traffic accordingly. Over time, more and more functionalities are migrated to the new system, while the legacy system becomes increasingly obsolete. The interface of the new system allows for seamless integration with existing components.
During this coexistence period, it’s essential to ensure data consistency between the old and new components. This often involves shared data stores or synchronisation mechanisms to keep both systems aligned.
The Strangler Pattern can significantly reduce risk, improve business continuity, and allow for incremental progress. By gradually replacing specific functionalities, teams can test, learn, and deliver value continuously while modernising the system.
This approach is particularly beneficial for complex codebases and monolithic legacy systems, where a complete rewrite would be impractical and fraught with risk.
Stay competitive and ensure long-term business success by modernising your applications. With our approach, you can start seeing real value even within the first 4 weeks.
What are the main benefits of using this pattern?
One of the most significant advantages is that it allows the legacy system to remain operational during the migration process. This ensures that business operations are not disrupted, providing a smoother transition and maintaining continuity.
The flexibility this pattern offers allows organisations to modernise at a pace that suits their business priorities, making adjustments based on continuous feedback. This iterative approach helps teams address complexities in manageable parts, reducing the overall risk associated with the migration.
Additionally, the patterns enable experimentation, allowing teams to test new functionalities without the risk of disrupting the entire system.
Breaking down the migration into smaller, manageable parts, the Strangler Fig Pattern facilitates close monitoring of progress. This ensures that new components can be validated and integrated smoothly with existing systems, minimising the risk of performance bottleneck and ensuring data consistency.
Creating small changes can lead to significant improvements over time, allowing teams to migrate effectively with code, despite the inherent complexity.
Overall, this architectural pattern offers a strategic and low-risk approach to system modernisation, making it a single point of valuable technology tool for businesses looking to innovate and stay competitive in new architecture.
Read more about modernisation:
- What is infrastructure modernisation and why is it essential for business growth?
- Replatforming: what is it and how does it work?
- Rearchitecting: why you should redesign your application?
Comparing the Strangler Fig Pattern with other approaches
When comparing the Strangler Fig Pattern with other approaches, its advantages become clear.
Unlike big-bang rewrites, which often lead to high risk and significant disruption during migrations, the Strangler Fig Pattern allows for gradual migration and modernisation. This incremental approach permits new functionalities to be integrated as old components are phased out, minimising disruption and reducing risk.
A key strength of the Strangler Fig Pattern is its ability to foster faster adoption of digital solutions. Businesses can implement new features without waiting for complete system overhauls, allowing them to stay competitive and innovate continuously.
This contrasts sharply with other approaches that require a complete rewrite of the system, which can be time-consuming and fraught with challenges.
Allowing individual features to be replaced and validated incrementally, this pattern supports a smoother and more controlled modernisation process, ensuring each new component is fully functional before the old one is decommissioned.
What types of systems are best suited for this approach?
The Strangler Fig Pattern is particularly well-suited for large monolithic applications, which have tightly coupled components that are difficult to scale or modify as a whole.
Business-critical legacy systems, where downtime is not an option, also benefit greatly from this approach. These applications must remain operational during the modernisation process, and the Strangler Fig Pattern allows for continuous operation while gradually introducing new functionalities.
Systems with clearly separable modules, such as platforms where functionality can be broken into well-defined domains or service (e.g., authentication, billing, reporting), are also excellent candidates for this microservice architecture pattern.
Overall, the Strangler Fig Pattern is versatile and can be applied to various types of systems, offering resources for future strangler pattern offers a strategic pathway for modernisation.
Thanks to our work, we decreased the lead time for changes from 2 months to 1 day, improved change failure rate from over 30% to below 10%, and saved 50% of the client’s Cloud costs.
What are the first steps when applying the Strangler Fig Pattern?
The first steps when applying the Strangler Fig Pattern involve careful planning and strategic execution to ensure a smooth and low-risk modernisation process.
It typically begins with a comprehensive assessment of the legacy system to understand its architecture, dependencies, and critical functionalities. This helps identify which components can be safely isolated and reimplemented first.
A routing layer is then introduced. This control point directs incoming requests either to the existing legacy system or to newly developed modern components, allowing both systems to coexist during the transition. This setup is crucial for maintaining system stability and ensuring a seamless migration process.
Once the routing mechanism is in place, teams choose a low-risk, high-value module to modernise – such as a self-contained feature that is frequently used and easy to decouple. This module is rebuilt using modern architecture and deployed alongside the legacy system, with routing logic updated to redirect traffic to the new component to mitigate risks.
Throughout this process, it’s essential to implement testing, monitoring, and data synchronisation strategies to ensure consistency, minimise disruption, and validate each implementation transition phase in this huge undertaking.
If you’re considering modernising your legacy systems but aren’t sure where to start, Future Processing is here to help. With proven experience in:
we guide organisations through successful, low-risk modernisation journeys.
Get in touch with our experts today to explore how we can support your business in building a future-ready, scalable, and efficient technology landscape.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this pattern only for application modernisation?
While commonly used for applications, the pattern can also apply to APIs, services, or even databases if applied strategically within a larger architectural transformation.
What technical components support this pattern?
You’ll often need API gateways, service proxies, routing logic, feature toggles, and robust CI/CD pipelines to support routing, integration, and safe deployments.
How do you manage traffic between legacy and new systems during the transition?
A routing layer (like an API gateway) determines whether to send a request to the legacy application or a modernised component based on the functionality being accessed.
When is the legacy system considered fully replaced?
Once all major functionalities are handled by modern components, and no user or system calls rely on the legacy application, the legacy system can be safely decommissioned.
How long does a Strangler Fig modernisation take?
It depends on system complexity, but the incremental nature allows you to deliver value early and continue over months or even years as priorities evolve.
How do you measure progress in a Strangler Fig migration?
Track percentage of functionality migrated, traffic redirected to new services, system performance improvements, and eventually, complete retirement of legacy components.
Assure seamless migration to cloud environments, improve performance, and handle increasing demands efficiently.
Modernisation of legacy systems refer to the process of upgrading or replacing outdated legacy systems to align with contemporary business requirements and technological advances.
